RICHARD SILVESTRI's Sunday 5/4/08 puzzle (answers) is very entertaining, mixing popular music with tree names. It will prove extra appealing to the millions of us who majored in Pop Music and minored in Arboriculture. I knew that would come in handy some day.
This is my first go at Guest-Blogging and I do hope I got the answers right. I think this stint will work out fine, as JimH provided a cookbook approach for providing a passable entry. Following is his 5 step (underlined) process:
1. Identify the Constructor.
This is where Jim would indicate how many Sunday puzzles Mr. Silvestri has done. Today, I think I will concentrate on the editor, instead. Mr. Shortz has edited, I don't know, say a gazillion puzzles. There seems to be a book of them in every room of my house.
2.Discuss Theme if Any.
The theme answers all have a word (or words or a syllable) of a popular song title replaced by the name of a tree, retaining the meanings of the titles while changing their pronunciations a hair or four. The clues to the Theme answers all follow the same format, e.g. [24a 1977 Dolly Parton song for tree fanciers]. The others are a 1965 Yardbirds song, a 1957 Jerry Lee Lewis song, a 1964 Bobby Goldsboro song, a 1982 Joan Jett and the Blackhearts song, a 1959 Chuck Berry song, and a 1978 Linda Ronstadt song. Here are the original song titles and their treed versions:
24a -- "Here You Come Again" becomes "Here You GUM Again"
33a -- "For Your Love" becomes "FIR Your Love"
50a -- "Great Balls of Fire" becomes "Great BALSA Fire"
61a -- "See the Funny Little Clown" becomes "CEDAR Funny Little Clown"
79a -- "I Love Rock'n'Roll" becomes "OLIVE Rock'n'Roll"
90a -- "Almost Grown" becomes "ELMost Grown"
107a -- "Poor, Poor Pitiful Me" becomes "PAWPAW Pitiful Me"
As I got the OLIVE answer first, I thought the theme had to do with switching two letters, but was soon disabused of that notion. I think Weird AL Yankovic would bless this puzzle. Some folks would elmost grown over these answers; I enjoyed all of them.
3. Discuss the Fill.
Choose a maximum of three descriptors from (Brilliant / Fresh / Surprising / Pantheotic / Desultory / Scrabbly / Crosswordesey / Old-timey / Too Obscure / Too Easy / Inconsistent with the quality of the theme / Too distant from my fields of expertise / Good). I found the Fill to be lively, interesting, and pretty challenging (whoops, those aren't on the list), and often very clever. A few items that seemed noteworthy:
58a "One trillionth: Prefix" -- PICO. Wonder what this does to Pico de Gallo?
69a "Like a lot of Australia" -- ARID. I was very glad this was not PAVER.
82a "Jazzy Nina" -- SIMONE. Somewhat obvious clue-wise, but I give constructors extra-credit for every mention of the goddess.
101a "Do police work" -- KEEP ORDER. I was having a horrid time in the Lower Right corner of the puzzle, and this clue was not helping. I had cLAN for KLAN, you know, like in the CCC. I swore off Google, but I knew calling the Police Department is always OK; they're there to help. I asked the Desk Sergeant what they do. He said "KEEP ORDER".
5d "Strand" -- SEA SHORE. Reminded me to read more English mysteries. Ruth Rendell is due.
31d "A Letter for _____" (Hume Cronym film)" -- EVIE. A nice coincidence, as just a couple days ago I suggested "Humecronym" (call me for the correct pronunciation) as a term to possibly solve the "Quarfoot" mini-controversy.
61d "Play-by-play partner" -- COLOR. That's a brilliant clue..where the announcer or analyst part just needs to be understood.
80d "Ran through again" -- REVIEWED. Good degree of ambiguity in the clue, so many possibilities between the RE and the ED. Misreading 89a as Flight information (instead of formation) didn't help.
104d "Something one can never do" -- DUET. Another great clue...but I still want to say "What about Natalie Cole"?
4. Go off on a Weird Tangent to Differentiate the Blog from Others.
Come on, Jim, that's a tough one. Couldn't we just await your return? Oh, what the heck, and apropos of minus-zero: Someday, possibly in 2011, when Charlie ascends to the throne, and, feeling he can finally be himself, he declares, in a rebellious act upending the monarchical tradition, that he is not to be the King, but rather "The Royal Formerly Known as Prince".
5. Summarize and sign-off.
Thanks Mr. Silvestri. An excellent puzzle, in my guest-opinion, a meaty Sunday challenge with a creative theme and well-rounded fill from many areas of knowledge.
I'm KarmaSartre and I approve this message.
Recent Comments